|
| Texts | Dugin | War of continents | Part II | 1991 |
Archivio de EURASIA the site of Martino Conserva (translations, publications)
original text
The Greate War of continents
Part I
Part
II
After
1945
After
“victory”
Hitler’s aggression against the USSR was the great
eurasian catastrophe.
After the terrible fratricidal war
between two geopolitically, spiritually and
metaphysically close, related peoples, between two
anti-atlantist oriented regimes, Stalin’s Russia and
Hitler’s Germany, USSR victory was actually equivalent
to a strategic defeat - since all historical experience
demonstrates that Germany can never be reconciled with a
defeat, so that the winner already by its victory
fastens the knot of a new forthcoming conflict, sowing
seeds of forthcoming war. Besides, Yalta caused Stalin
to solidarize with the Allies, that is with those powers
which have always been the worst enemies of Eurasia.
Stalin, perfectly understanding the laws of geopolitics
and having already made his eurasist choice, could not
fail to understand it. Immediately after the german
defeat, Stalin began to realize a new geopolitical
project, the Warsaw Agreement, integrating East European
countries in the atmosphere of Great Soviet Russia. And
here came the first conflicts and dissents with the
atlantists. Until 1948 Stalin disguised his continental
intents and even approved the creation of the state of
Israel, that was the major strategic act of England (and
more generally, of atlantism) in reinforcing its
military, economic and ideological influence in the Near
East. But already in 1948, using besides all other means
the chain of command of internal political positions of
the army (Zhukov, Vasilevskiy, Shtemenko etc.), Stalin
returned to orthodox eurasist geopolitics, renewed the
anti-atlantic purges within the Soviet government and
pronounced the “condemn” of Israel as an
anti-continental formation generated by “anglo-saxon
spies”. Strangely enough, Stalin’s death coincided with
the most dramatic and tense moment in the accomplishment
of his eurasist plans, when the perspective was actual
of a new continental union - USSR-China, that could
radically change the logics of planetary alignment of
forces and bring revenge to the Great Order of Eurasia.
If we take into account these reasons and the
geopolitical features of the post-stalinian course in
the USSR, the version about the assassination of Stalin
(advanced by many european historians) becomes more than
probable. And the main role of NKVD and its chief,
the sinister Berya, worst enemy of GRU, General Staff
and Eurasia, in the supposed assassination of Stalin is
remarked by the majority of the historians.*
In 1953, eight years after the pseudo-victory, there was
one only step before the real Victory (as well as in
1939). But instead of it the world saw the Fall of the
Titan.
The “polar” mission of general
Shtemenko
According to Jean Parvulesco, since the second half of
the ‘40s a key figure of eurasian geopolitical lobby in
the USSR was the general-colonel Sergey Matveevic
Shtemenko (1907 - 1976). His high sponsors were marshall
Zhukov and general Aleksandr Poskrebyshev (who,
according to some sources, carried over at Stalin a
mission similar to Martin Bormann’s at Hitler, that is
was the vehicle of germanophile ideas). During the ‘60s
Shtemenko was one of the key figures in the Soviet Army:
in different periods he was commander of the armed
forces of the Warsaw Agreement countries and chief of
the General Staff of the USSR. But the most relevant of
his appointments, according to the fundamental line of
our conspirological study, was the position of head of
the GRU in the years 1946-1948 and 1956-1957. With
Shtemenko the GRU was completely restored in its
“polar”, occult, order features introduced into the
structure of GRU by its founder Aralov. Pierre de
Villemarest called general-colonel Shtemenko the
first and most outstanding Soviet geopolitician.
Shtemenko was a natural and univocal supporter of the
Great Continental Project, in full correspondence with
the traditional logic of the eurasist Order. In
his book Villemarest wrote about him: «Shtemenko
belonged to that special caste of Soviet officers who,
though being also “soviet”, were nevertheless
representative of great-russian spirit and expansionist
beliefs». And further: «For this caste the USSR is an
empire called to guide [upravlyat] the eurasian
continent, and not only from the Urals to Brest, but
from the Urals to Mongolia, from Central Asia up to the
Mediterranean». Strategic plans of Shtemenko included
the peaceful economic-cultural penetration into
Afghanistan (about which he spoke in the years
1948-1952) and the entry of Soviet troops in the arab
capitals - Beyrut, Damascus, Cairo, Algeri. Already in
1948 Shtemenko insisted on the special geopolitical role
of Afghanistan, which would allow the USSR to gain
access to the ocean and boost the military power of the
Soviet fleet in the Black and Mediterranean seas. It is
important to notice that the famous admiral Gorshkov was
a close friend of general-colonel Shtemenko. Shtemenko
and the occult subdivision, revived by him, in GRU
created under Stalin a powerful and advanced network of
eurasist influence, which, despite of all Berya's
attempts to erase it, was not destroyed even after
Stalin’s death - although from 1953 to the middle of the
‘60s the eurasist lobby within the army was compelled to
hold a defensive position. As an unavoidable evil, GRU
agents for 23 years (1963-1986) had to stand as the head
of GRU the atlantic agent of Lubyanka, former
“liquidator”, general Petr Ivashutin. It was an
indispensable compromise. General-colonel Shtemenko,
agent of the “Polar Order”, Order of Eurasia - that is
key which will help us understand the secret logics of
Soviet history from Khrushev to perestroyka. This
history,- not differently, however, from all world
history – is the both open and obscure fight of two
secret orders, “Minstrels of Morgana” and “Minstrels
of Mursia”, devotees of the Egyptian Seth, the Red
Ass, and devotees of the northern, polar Apollon, killer
of the Snake Python.
Nikita Khrushev, agent of
Atlantis Khrushev was the first
protegé of the atlantist lobby to become the individual
leader of the USSR. Despite his dissents with Berya,
Khrushev leaned on KGB and at a definite time made the
final , opposite to the choice of Lenin and Stalin.
Khrushev's activity was directed to destroying the
internal structures of the eurasists in the USSR, and
also to undermining the global continental project of a
supra-statal planetary block. The coming of Khrushev was
the coming to power of KGB. Khrushev, once he had
consolidated his position, begins to strike blow after
blow against all levels of the
continental-patriotic lobby. All his attention is
henceforth centered on the anglo-saxon countries,
especially on the US. Khrushev’s slogan “to catch up and
bypass the West” means alignment to the atlantic powers
and acknowledgement of their social and economic
superiority. The theses about the rapid approach of
communism are directed to riding again the
“leftist-messianic”, “bolshevist-internationalist”
tendencies almost forgotten during the long years of
eurasian imperial geopolitical stalinism. Khrushev aims
to strike a blow on all “soil” traditional structures,
which had been saved, due to the secret protection of
the Eurasian Order, even in the most terrible periods of
red terror. Khrushev wants definitively to get rid of
the Russian Orthodox church. Khrushev was “americanist”
and “atlantist” in everything: starting from the famous
atlantic “corn” and ending with his military concepts
exclusively based on employing intercontinental missiles
to the detriment of all remaining kinds of weapons.
Khrushev did not care at all for the eurasian continent.
He was concerned with Latin America, Cuba etc. Between
the atlantists from Khrushev war cabinet (whose leader
was marshal S.S. Biryuzov) and the eurasists from
Shtemenko's group there was almost open conflict.
Khrushev insisted on the concept of “nuclear
intercontinental blitzkrieg”, which, from the
continental point of view, is nothing else than
strategic sabotage, weakening the real military power of
continental forces, shattering the economy and creating
a planetary apocalyptical threat. After Khrushev’s
dismissal, “Red Star” quite fairly wrote: «That
strategy, which we eventually refused, could only be
born in an ill brain». Shtemenko even earlier in the
same “Red Star” warned: «It is nowise possible to base
the safety of the USSR only on ballistic
intercontinental missiles». With Khrushev begins the
definitive separation of intra-statal functions: “men of
the party” and representatives of Lubyanka
solidarize henceforth with khrushevists on the strategy
of “nuclear blitzkrieg” (the Soviet Army becomes the
first hostage of the “nuclear terrorists” of KPSS
[Communist Party of the Soviet Union], more exact, of
the atlantic wing of KPSS), while eurasists and GRU
lobbyists insist on the development of conventional
armaments and try to take a revenge through military
space studies. In 1958 Khrushev dismisses from authority
the powerful and extremely popular eurasian marshall
Zhukov. In 1959 he starts another offensive – he places
at the head of GRU one of the most odious figures of
Soviet history, the bloody carnefice, chekist Ivan
Serov, known under the nickname of “Zhivoder”. This
bloody character - ideal type for the characteristic of
Order of Red Ass as a whole – was abhored by the General
Staff and, of course, by GRU agents and patriots of
Eurasia in the first place. Another “atlantist”, general
Mironov, becomes the accountable curator of the
so-called “executive organs” - that means supervision
above basic army and intelligence subdivisions. However
the khrushevist offensive manoeuvres meet the well
coordinated occult reaction of the eurasists: Konev,
Sokolovskiy, Timoshenko, Grechko try to defeat Khrushev
at any cost. Each superfluous day of stay in power of
this “atlantist” renders an irreplaceable ideological,
strategic and political damage to the USSR, and, as a
whole, to the interests of the continental powers. Let's
notice another curious detail: in Khrushev's epoch the
domination of the “totalitarian-hegelian” line in Soviet
“ritualistic” marxist philosophy (attributing primacy to
the supra-individual, “objective” factors above the
individual and subjective) is replaced by the domination
of the “subjective-kantian” line (attributing primacy to
the individualistic and “subjective” above the
“objective”). Just in those times begins the quick
degradation of civic education, appears the new
constellation of “khrushevist” academicians
and scientists representing a mob of unskilled and
arrogant laymen. (We shall recollect, for instance, as a
representantives of “khrushevists” A.N. Yakovlev,
who admitted to have criticized Marcuse, not having
found time at all to read him; the Stalin scientists
continuing, though in a peculiar form, the
pre-revolutionary academic traditions, as a rule, were
distinguished for their knowledge of those authors which
they sincerely or not so sincerely criticized). With
Khrushev begins the step-by-step propagation in the
society of an “atlantism”-oriented, groundless and
cosmopolitan intelligentsia, which KGB brood unseen even
in its most radical and dissident variants. The themes
of the West, the themes of the US begin to spread in the
USSR as “prohibited”, but “attractive” ideals from the
end of the ‘50s – beginning of the ‘60s.
The long path to
1977 Khrushev's dismissal was
undoubtedly made by hands of the Order of Eurasia. It is
indicative, that eight days after he left the place of
General Secretary, the airplane on which were two key
agents the “atlantic” lobby - marshall Biryuzov and
general Mironov – suffered a crash. After Khrushev's
knockout the eurasists step-by-step began to recover
their positions. Leonid Brezhnev was a figure supported
by the eurasists. It is significant, that the writer
Smirnov in 1965 wrote: “On May 9, 1965 at the parade for
victory in Moscow before the veterans’ columns should
pass, celebrating the twentieth anniversary of Victory,
marshall Zhukov himself, decorated with battle orders”.
After seven years of khrushevian disgrace Zhukov was
again rehabilitated. It was the present victory of GRU.
But the triumph of the Order of Eurasia under Brezhnev
was far from being complete. “Atlantists” from KGB were
not going to to surrender. The continental projects were
constantly stopped. In the middle of the ‘60s even there
was a paradoxical situation, when the perspective of the
continental block was debated, bypassing the USSR. In
this respect it is interesting to report the facts about
negotiations of Arthur Axmann - former head of the
“Hitler-jugend” organization and participant to the
eurasian lobby inside the SS - with Zhou Enlai
concerning the creation of a united continental block
Pekin – Berlin - Paris, bypassing the USSR. Laval, and
even general de Gaulle without reserve greeted such
project. A further meeting was held in Bucharest. Arthur
Axmann in Madrid told Jean Parvulesco about the
following episode on his flight to Pekin. In the same
plane sat a group of Soviet military, which tried to
convince Axmann of the necessity of including also the
USSR in this Eurasian project – which was, however, the
old dream of Axmann himslef, oppositor of Hitler’s
antislavic racism since the times of his implication in
the eurasian lobby inside the SS (the SS circle of
hauptmann Aleksandr Doleschallek, Richard Hildebrandt,
Guenther Kaufmann etc., linked, of course, with Walther
Nikolay and Martin Bormann). GRU officers also reported
to Axmann about the intrigues of the atlantist lobby in
the USSR, putting insuperable obstacles to all
geopolitical projects oriented to the continent – and so
to all continental powers, most important of which being
the USSR. The atlantists from KGB, using their
traditional tactics, forced the Army to resign itself
with Ivashutin (old chekist and extremely unpopular
figure) at the head of GRU for 23 years. But
nevertheless, since 1973 Brezhnev began to advance the
military closer and closer to the government of the
country. In 1973 marshall Grechko became member of the
Politburo. Replacing him, also Ustinov entered this
body, though we must notice that the chiefs of KGB -
Andropov, and later also his heir Chernikov - were
members of the Politburo since 1967. But the greatest
triumph of the Army and GRU was in 1977, when the new
brezhnevian constitution founded the “Security Council”,
becoming a self-supporting and formally independent
legal and political force. It was a victory of the Army
over KGB. It was a victory of Eurasia. The cautious and
never hastening Brezhnev had fulfilled his promise –
made to the eurasian lobby – to change the backstage
order of the internal soviet structure of power. The
army had now its rigorous agency at the highest level.
Brezhnev's strategy was on the whole continentally
oriented, though space and space weapon became
nevertheless the basic sphere of strategic interest. In
a parallel way to working at space war projects, the
geopolitics of the Brezhnev epoch elaborated applicable
ideological and political models taking into account the
new strategic and military nomenclature and typology of
the space age. It is important to mention in this
context of idea of the writer and ideologist of the
patriotic movement A.Prokhanov, tightly linked to
definite geopolitical groups in the General Staff since
the times of marshall Ogarkov. ?.Prokhanov assures that
the soviet-eurasian military strategy at the end of the
‘70s - first half of the ‘80s seriously elaborated the
project of a new continental-space civilization based on
a combination of spiritual, “soil” and metaphysical
traditions of Eurasia with ultra-modern techniques,
space stylistics and the global system of the “new
communications”. This, in Prokhanov’s opinion, should
become the eurasian answer to the American pattern of
“star wars”, exhibiting the future space age as the
celebration of the anglo-saxon idea not only on the
planet, but also in the universe. To the American
universe, the American Space,
the“soil-futuristical” ideologists of the General
Staff, according to Prokhanov, were ready to oppose the
russian universe, the eurasian universe, the image of
Great Eurasia, projecting itself on boundless regions of
stars and planets. “Neighbours” of Lubyanka had chosen a
Space arranged according to the image of “insular”
mercantile-colonial civilizations of the extreme West.
The American pattern fully suited them. So, in the
newest technological shapes, we again meet with the most
ancient themes, with voices from a millennial history,
with the call from our far ancestors always solving an
essentially single problem: “Is it necessary to destroy
Carthago?”- in whatever shape this problem ever
presented itself.
Geopolitics of marshal
Ogarkov
One of the immediate heirs of Shtemenko’s
geopolitical mission was marshal N.V. Ogarkov, eminent
geopolitician, strategist and eurasist. He carried on
the activity of the “Polar” Order within the Army to the
middle of the ‘80s. Of the three brezhnevian chiefs of
the General Staff - Zakharov, Kulikov, Ogarkov (all
three convinced eurasists) – the brightest was Ogarkov,
an ingenious connoisseur of masking, many times
strategically fooling both external and internal
atlantists. Ogarkov was the organizer of the Prague
operation, which passed so smoothly only because he
managed to fully confuse NATO intelligence services the
and to impose on them some excellently sent
misinformation. It is curious to mark that the events of
the “Prague spring”, ended for democratic putschists in
a “sad autumn”, were somehow a strategic duel between
two characters dedicated to the deepest secrets of the
planetary conflict. Today it is well-known that the
occult author and director of the “Prague spring” was
David Goldstucker. In this operation he was confronted
to the eurasist Ogarkov, and it is necessary to notice
that Ogakov’s victory was not simply the victory of
rough force of the Soviet tanks, but a victory of
thought, cunning and magnificent mastering of the art of
misinformation, “camouflage”, with the help of which
NATO leadership was led to commit the worst mistakes and
had no time for that reaction which, of course, doctor
Goldstucker and his creatures (Dubchek, Havel etc.) from
the beggining counted upon. Ogarkov pioneered the
creation of “Spetsnaz” [special forces], called to
perform local and instant operations in the back-zone of
the opponent’s front, absolutely necessary for the
success especially of continental, local military
operations. Geopolitically marshal Ogarkov always openly
(in contrast to the hidden and cautious eurasist
Grechko) defended the “eurasian project” and aspired to
transform the USSR Armed Forces so that they could
conduct themselves in the best way in a long, local war
with prevailing conventional weapons. After Krushev the
question about “nuclear and intercontinental” kinds of
weapons acquired a symbolical sense - depending on the
emphasis of the military doctrine on “global war ” or on
“local war ” in army circles defined as “ours” and
“theirs”, that is representatives of the atlantist or
eurasian lobby: “ local war” with application of
conventional armaments and without using nuclear weapons
was the slogan of the “eurasists”, and “total nuclear
war” the slogan of the atlantists, never stopping to put
ideological pressure on the Army. Around Ogarkov the
military élite of eurasian orientation was grouped
together. First of all, his fellow comrades were
marshals Akhromeev and Yazov. Both of them, especially
Akhromeev, were secretly devoted to the “Polar Order ”,
founded in the Soviet Army already by Mikhail
Tukhachevsky in parallel to Aralov’s similar
organization, created by him immediately after the
appearance of GRU.
The Afghanistan
catastrophe
The huge concentration of power in the hands of the
eurasist military after 1977 threatened the atlantists’s
clan. To KGB and other servants of the “Dancing Death”
inside the Soviet government it was necessary to
undertake any urgent counter-measures. Precise data
allow to believe that the Afghanistan war was inspired
by KGB to discredit the Army in the course of a long and
insensate conflict and to provoke the atlantic
interference in the internal political situation on part
of the US. The Afghanistan conflict is considered as the
instigating of KGB against the Soviet Army and, more
widely, against the whole eurasian lobby, by such
specialists of occult sovietology as Pierre de
Villemarest and Jean Parvulesco. Knowing about the
geopolitical projects of general Shtemenko, and in
particular, about the geopolitical and strategic value
of Afghanistan, the people from Lubyanka decided to
provoke an armed and forced intervention in the afghani
internal political situation. (It is necessary to
notice, thus, that Shtemenko himself excluded such
interference, insisting on peaceful integration and
gradual economic-strategic infiltration of Afghanistan
in complete correspondence with the normal logics of any
organic and natural economic and cultural expansion on
the north-south axis). And not only starting an
insensate war, but also its irresolute, uncertain, dull
conducting was a consequence of KGB interference in the
affairs of the Army - since the atlantists needed the
USSR to lose the war, a war which could result in the
definitive destruction of the Eurasian block. Therefore
in Afghanistan KGB special forces arranged acts of
terrorism against the peaceful afghani population - that
was a perfect absurdity, if the Soviet troops really
wanted to integrate Afghanistan and to make it a
geopolitical vassal. From above through the Party and
the Politburo the atlantists, vice-versa, tried to rein
the most reasonable military operations, sometimes
stopping them, when they began to be crowned with
success. Pierre de Villemarest affirms that this war was
lost only because the highest ranks in the Soviet
government wanted it to be lost. Anyway, this war was
fatal for the Army, GRU and the Eurasian Order.
The “right-wing” in KGB and the
Andropov
paradox
In the post-brezhnevian epoch one very important point
began to show, characteristic for all history of the
invisible fight of the two Orders. Its meaning is that
the atlantist lobby in Eurasia, as we often stressed,
leans not only to the “left” (though, certainly, this is
preferred owing to some typological affinity of their
concept itself with the atlantist plot), but also to the
“right”. For this reason post-war NKVD-KGB, remaining
essentially atlantist, adopted some definite ideological
features of Army, conservative, “right” orientation.
Genetically ascending to the squads of anti-soil,
anti-Russian and anti-state punitive red gangs of the
‘20s, KGB at the same time has undergone to a
significant influence of “right-wing” eurasists of GRU
and the General Staff in those times when Stalin’s
imperialism was dominant. Such duplicity of KGB
logically resulted in a definite compromise in KGB
structure, which can explain all the political and
conspirological “oddness” linked to this organization.
If the substance and the major centre of KGB remained
purely atlantist, integrated in the united planetary
network of atlantist intelligences, at the periphery,
among ordinary employees and even officers, a
“nationalist” atmosphere developed on the whole. However
this “Lubyanka nationalism” (sometimes joined with a
rather strong judeophobia) always corresponded to the
principle “blood over soil”- that is, it never had
actually a continental, imperial, eurasian character.
And such situation rather suited the figures of the
atlantist Order, as this “naive nationalism” of the
ordinary employees served as a perfect masking for the
network of anti-soil, “messianic” and mondialist agents.
As a whole, post-war KGB was typologically similar to
panslavist groups inside the imperial government on the
eve of the First World War and with racist, xenophobe
organizations in the Reich, serving as a cover for the
atlantist residents. In this perspective it is necessary
to consider the coming to power of Yuri Andropov, former
KGB chief, after Brezhnev's death. The above mentioned
reasons of KGB duplicity will help to understand the
duality of Andropov's role, and also the dualist image
of this figure, which can be simultaneously considered
as both father of perestroyka and democratization,
“accomplished” by Gorbachev, and extreme conservative
attempting to restore the totalitarian epoch of Lavrenty
Berya.*
It is curious, that among simple russian people in
relation to Andropov two opposite estimations are
common: “Andropov - jew - sionist” and “Andropov -
patriot - anti-semite”. (Of course, both these
definitions should be “metaphorically” understood).
Actually, Andropov’s riddle is simple - he is a
representative of KGB, i.e. complete and convinced
atlantist, loyal to his Order of the “Dancing Death”. He
was simultaneously “jew - sionist” and “patriot -
anti-Semite”, as this pair looks contradictory only in
extremely simplified conspirological patterns, whereas
actually the conspirological picture is much more
complex, and its key factors are neither national nor
political criteria, but only fundamental geopolitical
orientations more often carefully kept secret to the
outsiders. The coming of Andropov was the second
terrible blow against the Army after the beginning of
the Afghanistan war. Now the authority in the state was
in the hands of a member of that organization which
during all its existence had but one goal - to erase the
Order of Eurasia inside the USSR, to shatter the secret
structures created by Aralov, Tukhachevsky, Shtemenko,
Ogarkov, Akhromeev and other eurasists, to blow up
Eurasia from the inside, to make once and for all of the
idea of a new continental block an unrealizable utopia,
a fiction, to gain definitive victory to “New Carthago”,
to the US, to establish together with the CIA the New
World Order on the planet, the New Trade Construction.
The coming of Andropov, the coming of the “right of
KGB”, meant no more an no less as the beginning of
perestroyka.
The double agent Mikhail
Gorbachev
The preliminary phase of perestroyka - preparing the new
cadres, allocation of roles, introducing the necessary
people into the government, the general script of
the events - all this was carried out by Yuri
Andropov together with other atlantist analysts of
special services and experts from the Orders of the
“Dancing Death”. But Andropov well understood that at
any stage of perestroyka the eurasists could try to take
revenge, to throw off the atlantists from KGB and
Politburo and to lead the country according to an
eurasian policy. Therefore the choice of the major
figure of the new policy fell on the most evasive and
uncertain of the then supreme leaders, who was so
cautious, flexible and elusive, that none of the two
sides did know for what Order he actually worked. On the
other hand, according to the most ancient traditions of
Order of Atlantic, to which Andropov belonged, it was
accepted to give special attention to people whose
appearance showed some eloquent defect. According to
this principle were selected the highest priests of the
cult of the aegyptian ass-headed god Seth. Gorbachev
with his mark (which, by the way, one Mussulman -
traditionalist has read as an arabian inscription
of three letters - kaf, fa, ra, that gives
“Kafir”, i.e. “hypocrite”) was the most eligible figure.
Promoting Gorbachev, Andropov calculated that his
candidature would satisfy both geopolitical groupings,
as the solution of internal tensions in the USSR already
for a long time had ripened and the political change
should logically be backed by both atlantists and
eurasists. The atlantists’ interest in change was
obvious, but also the eurasists - after the beginning of
the Afghanistan war and the coming of Andropov to power
- were not anymore interested in preserving the status
quo, and consequently would easily accept the
transformation. Gorbachev was convenient and useful to
everyone. As Gorbachev's guardians on behalf of the two
conflicting Orders were apponted A.I.Lukyanov and
A.N.Yakovlev. Both these figures were the immediate
participants to the ramified continental conspiracy,
showing however two conflicting parties.
The true face of Anatoliy
Lukyanov
Since 1987 Anatoliy Ivanovic Lukyanov became the head of
the so-called “administrative organs”. Now the destiny
of any appointment or promotion among the highest
military ranks depended on him. Lukyanov, always showing
loyalty to Gorbachev, constantly tried, nevertheless, to
interpret in the eurasist key the ambiguous and nebulous
instructions of the new Kremlin leader. Gorbachev’s
aspiration to terminate the Afghanistan conflict was in
the hands of the Army, and there are some reasons to
believe that Lukyanov was involved in this geopolitical
action. As flexible and cautious as Gorbachev, Lukyanov,
contrary to him, had a strict and clear geopolitical
attitude. His purpose, as well as the purpose of the
“Polar” Order, was the Great Eurasia from Mongolia up to
the Mediterranean, the Pax Eurasiatica, the great
continental union. Lukyanov was obliged by virtue of his
position to control GRU and to supervise the General
Staff, but, actually, this accurate and quiet man was
not the “guardian of the messianic bolsheviks ” upon the
military eurasian state within the state, but the
messenger of GRU, surveilling the bolsheviks-atlantists
on behalf of the Army. Being covered by his ostensibly
standing on a “centre-left” position, Lukyanov realized
in the Supreme Soviet a special mission, whose sense
consisted in forming the parliamentary block oriented
for the benefit of the secret eurasian mission.
“ Mr. Perestroyka
”
Aleksandr Nikolaevic Yakovlev already from the beginning
of the ‘70s was one of the major ideologists of the open
atlantism in the USSR. Dues must be given, that he
started his open attacks against the patriots-eurasists
already in 1974, when the positions of GRU were very
strong and when Grechko already was member of the
Politburo. By openely invoking the ideological pogrom of
the “national-bolshevik” literature, which in those
years served as a tribune for the ciphered exchange of
information, ideas, concepts and projects for all
patriotic eurasian lobby, Yakovlev accepted to run a
definite risk. And despite intercession from Andropov
and the highest circles of KGB after the publication of
famous paper «Against anti-historicism», the manifest of
russophobe and anti-patriotic atlantism, he nevertheless
had to be sent away from Russia. The truth was that KGB
had decided to turn “poison into medicine” and to use
Yakovlev's envoy in Canada for activating an espionage
atlantist network. According to the informations
collected by Jean Parvulesco in his report The GRU
Galaxy, in Ottawa, where Yakovlev was sent afterwards,
he entered into contact with David Golstucker, who
represented at that time in the US the international
interests of Israel, under the cover of his involvement
in confidential negotiation with a Chicago firm linked
to nuclear power engineering. Dr. David Golstucker who,
as it is known, was a relevant figure not only in
Israeli special services, but also directly in special
services of anglo-saxon countries (this on the whole
reminds of a situation characteristic also for Soviet
KGB), elaborated together with Yakovlev the atlantist
strategy of the future perestroyka. This fact is so
well-known in the West, that Yakovlev's name there is
just “Mr. Perestroyka”. So already for the second time
in history, practically the same figures prepared for a
desperate, complex, dangerous and capturing geopolitical
duel. Once before, during the Prague spring,
Goldstucker, agent of the“Dancing Death”, suffered
a crushing defeat from GRU - from the collected, clever,
brilliant and courageous servants of the Order of
Eurasia, general Shtemenko and marshal Ogarkov. The same
Goldstucker ten years after prepared his revenge. This
time GRU and Soviet General Staff should be attacked on
their own territory, instead of “neutral”
Czechoslovakia. And this time Goldstucker hoped not for
the slow NATO with its huge, terrible, but in some
situations useless nuclear arsenal. Now the major
destructive weapon of the resident of planetary
atlantism - Goldstucker - should become the swollen “Mr.
Perestroyka”, the brand-new tactical weapon of the Order
of the Red Ass, hope of the atlantic battle orders,
captain of the occult anglo-saxon “spetsnaz”, deserted
from Ottawa in the rear of the eurasist opponent.
Between false
alternatives
The true logics of perestroyka, that is the logics of
the cyclical manoeuvring of the super-uncertain
Gorbachev between two poles – a vivid reminder the
course of illness with manic-depressive psychoses
- as a matter of fact remained completely
incomprehensible until the same August putsch, for the
reason that very few guessed the true role of Anatoliy
Lukyanov. Such conspiracy resulted, eventually, in the
catastrophe of the eurasian lobby. The atlantic authors
of the anti-imperial project of perestroyka resorted in
this case to a traditional method - the creation of a
pseudo-opposition, i.e. the substitution of a false
“conservative” pole to the real one. Since the true
enemies of the atlantists were not simply nationalists,
but “ nationalists of an imperial, continental kind ”,
“continentalists”, it is natural that the
pseudo-opposition to the open atlantism of “Mr.
Perestroyka” should be anything but eurasist. Following
this logics the people from the Atlantic Order, with the
active involvement of KGB, created parallel and
consequently false poles. These poles were:
1) “communists - conservatives”. Their
symbols were Yegor Ligachev and then Ivan Polozkov
(both of them at some moment vanished as smoke, and
this is not surprising, as their opposition was
generally not based on any principles, and besides was
a centuries old and well-known set-up).
2)
“patriots - nationalists”. This movement was created
through the active involvement of KGB, which projected
chauvinistically a judeophobe position on marginal
groupings of sincere but short-sighted patriots, thus
setting up a special algorithm of “patriotic
movement”, unable to cause any serious harm to the
more and more legalized atlantist lobby.
3)
“national-bolsheviks”. This current was more
interesting and stood close to the conceptions of the
eurasist lobby, but, thanks to the efforts of KGB, the
sense of measure here was lost and the
“national-bolshevik”conception assumed a repelling,
grotesque and extremist character - both in the sense
of an excessive accentuation of “leninism”, and in the
sense of excessive judeophobia.
4) finally,
the highest ruse of the atlantist KGB was to promote
KGB itself as an opposition to the “democrats” - and
this course too worked, since even to open employees
of “Lubyanka” the “patriots” referred with definite
trust, and even with some hope. And at
this time KGB detachments arranged the atlantist
revolutions in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia,
staged the show of repression in Romania, broke the
Berlin wall, betraid Honecker, threw off Zhivkov, helped
the separatists in the Baltic Republics and Caucasus,
and as a culmination of their atlantist triumph,
prepared the theatrical putsch in August 1991!
So “the most elusive man” with a characteristic mark
on his front plied between “Mr. Perestroyka” and
Anatoliy Lukyanov, but exteriorly it seemed, that his
second pole was not at all Lukyanov, but someone
different, more odious, more scandalous, more showy, but
really either a completely insignificant figure, or a
clear straw-man. GRU and the Army with expectation and
impatience looked at Anatoliy Lukyanov. Yes, to some
changes - end of the insensate war, reduction of
intercontinental arms, foreign policy steps towards
Germany, Japan and China – the eurasists could pay
compliments. Even the dedication to the theme of the
“common european home” in the “Polar” Order could be
easily interpreted in the key, since this doctrine was
drawn from the geopolitical arsenal of that eurasist
opposition within the SS to which belonged Axmann,
Hildebrandt, Doleschallek, Kaufmann etc. (typologically
linked with the Order of Eurasia in GRU). But the ruin
of the Union, the attacks against the Army, the attempts
to involve the Army in nationalist and micro-territorial
conflicts, the suicidal policies in the Baltic
Republics, shattering the last remains so valuable for
the eurasists of the Ribbentropp-Molotov pact, the
promotion of uncontrolled mafia and open criminals into
the political arena, and many other things led GRU in a
blind alley. But Anatoliy Lukyanov remained in the
shadow. Cautiously, consequently and step by step he
prepared a back strike, decisive and final. Up to last
moment it seemed that everything could be saved in a
moment, and then the eurasist lobby would use all the
positive geopolitical sides of “perestroyka”, having
done with “Mr. Perestroyka” and his accomplices, who
from then on were all “burned”, and the new great era
would begin, free from the communists, atlantists and
servants of the “Dancing Death”, the era of Eurasia,
Cosmic Eurasia, era of Sacral Solar Continent, Era of
the East. But has burst August 1991.
Putsch, culmination of the occult
war
Deputy Obolenskiy, member of the comission of inquiry of
business about the affair of GKChP [Gosudarstvenniy
Komitet po Chrezvichaynomu Polozhenyu; State Committe
for the State of Emergency within the PCUS], a few time
after the putsch made a strange declaration to the mass
media: «The truth concerning the events of August 1991,
probably, will be found out only by our descendants one
hundred years from now». What terrible secret touched
Obolenskiy, investigating the history of putsch?
From the point of view of geopolitical conspirology, the
argument here can be only one: he had touched materials
linked to the occult war of two Orders behind the scenes
of power, to the mysterious opposition of Order of
Eurasia and Order of Atlantic. Only in this case, the
declaration of deputy Obolenskiy acquires sense, and his
reliance on safety of secret becomes clear. The August
putsch was (or should be, on premeditation of his
authors) the culmination of geopolitical opposition, the
decisive moment of the invisible war. The order of
Atlantic could not ignore that the eurasists prepared
for winter 1991-1992 years a definite operation, which
should result in introducing a military regime on the
whole USSR territory under pretext of stabilizing the
social, political and economic situation. They also
perfectly understood that the ideological attitude of
the eurasist military direction would have been
non-communist and patriotically oriented, but without
the “anti-semitism”, xenofobia and “panslavism”
traditional for KGB. In other words, the military
direction promised to be stable, liberal in the economic
field, geopolitically correct, exempt from terrorist
kurtosises peculiar to bolshevik forms of dictatorship.
Besides, the Eurasian Military Regime, Roman-imperial
Regime, had every chance to be popular to the highest
degree, as it would refrain from “communist dogmatism”
and “marxist utopism”, on the one hand, but on the other
- it would be quite responsive to the natural
inclination to hierarchy, to discipline, to
centralization and communitarianism, sociality,
“integrality” (in Khomyakov's sense) of all true
Eurasian ethnoses. The patriotism of the Military Regime
should have been imperial, instead of “russian” and
“nationalist” in the narrow sense of this concept. All
this made such perspective not only unacceptable, but
fatal and deathly to the atlantist lobby inside the
USSR, and also for world-wide atlantist mondialism.
Despite of the huge destructions caused to the country
by the agents of the “Order of the Dancing Death”, by
“Mr. Perestroyka”, together with his comrade from KGB,
Shevardnadze (accursed, by the way, by his own Georgian
people), the Order of the Eurasists knew how to use this
negative situation to the benefit of their own position,
since in the secret GRU departments there worked worthy
followers of the great russian strategists - Shtemenko
and Ogarkov. The geopolitical duel with Goldstucker
could end with a defeat for this skilled and active
representant of the Atlantic Order. The major problem
for the atlantists was to prevent the forming of a war
situation in the USSR, to which, it appear, the logics
of events was leading. Just to this purpose the August
putsch was organized.
continue...
|
Напуганные Соросом
Перинчек: Операция в Африне ослабляет позиции США в Сирии
Евразийство vs национал-демократия: кому действительно нужна Великая Россия?
Галицийский прорыв вен
“Плавильный котёл” для России?
Афганистан: США бежали. Что дальше?
«Нортвудс», далее везде
Кого пугает «мёртвая рука»?
Сетевые войны: осознать и действовать
Воплощение образа Зевса и символ борьбы за свободу
Почему до сих пор не взяли Харьков
Муратов: Успехи Донбасса должны побудить жителей Украины к борьбе против киевского режима
Турецкий фактор закавказской политики: от продвижения западных интересов к евразийской геополитике
Закавказье: сплотиться против «Анаконды»
Валерий Коровин: слово о Русском Кавказе
Россия открывает ворота на Юг
Европу спасёт Русское чудо
Россия и Куба: вместе против расчеловечивания и однополярности
Ежедневно 60 тысяч детей в США отправляются за решетку
«Новая эпоха – новые пути»: шаг к укреплению многополярности
Трудовые будни самарской миграционки
Крещенские купания: как относиться, как подготовиться и… начать моржевать?
Вечер «непокорных» в «Бункере на Лубянке»
Пропуская сквозь себя войну
Награда для современных последователей Ковпака
Ошибки СВО: осознать и победить
Фронтовики или подопытные кролики?
Уроки «Крокуса»
Че Гевара: его боялись США
Россия-Куба: вместе мы создаем многополярный мир