|
Texts| Dugin | War of continents | Part I | 1990 |
Archivio de EURASIA the site of Martino Conserva (translations, publications)
original text
Aleksandr
Dugin
THE GREAT WAR OF
CONTINENTS
This text was originally published as Part III of
“Konspirologya” (The Analysis of Conspirations),
Arktogeja, Moscow
1992
Table of contents
Part
I - Before 1945Geopolitics
and the secret forces of history The
bases of geopolitics “Conspiracy
of the Atlantists” Conspiracy
of the“eurasists” “Blood
and Soil - “Blood or Soil?” Panslavism
against eurasism The
atlantists and racism Who
is spy of whom? You
said GRU, mister Parvulesco? GRU
against KGB The
Ribbentropp-Molotov pact and the subsequent
revenge of the atlantists Contours
of the Atlantic lobby KGB
at the service of the “Dancing Death”
Convergence
of special services and the “polar
mission
of GRU” Rise
and eclypse of the Eurasian Sun
Part
II - After 1945After
“victory” The
“Polar” mission of general Shtemenko
Nikita
Khrushev, agent of Atlantis
The
long path to 1977 Geopolitics
of marshal Ogarkov The
Afghanistan catastrophe The
“Right” in KGB and the Andropov
paradox The
double agent Mikhail Gorbachev
The
true face of Anatoly Lukyanov
“Mr.
Perestroyka” Between
false alternatives Putsch,
culmination of the occult war
Miscalculations
of marshal Yazov “Mr.
Perestroyka”goes on attack Lukyanov
and the ritual dwell on marshal
Akhromeev’s
tomb Metaphysics
of the occult war The
end of Times Endkampf
Order
and “ours” Hour
of Eurasia
Geopolitics and secret forces of
history
The patterns of “conspiracy” are extremely
miscellaneous. In this sphere the greatest popularity
indoubtedly goes to the concept of the “Judaic-Masonic”
conspiracy, so spread today in the most different
circles. Basically, this theory deserves the most severe
study, and we should recognize that we have no complete
and serious scientific analysis of this theme, despite
of hundreds and thousand works both “exposing” this
conspiracy, and “substantiating” its non-existence. But
in the present work we shall prove a completely diverse
conspirologic pattern, based on a system of coordinates
distinct from the “Judaic-Masonic” versions. We shall
try in general to describe the planetary “conspiracy” of
two opposite “occult” forces, whose secret opposition
and the invisible fight predetermined the logics of
world history. These forces, in our opinion, are first
of all characterized neither by national specificity nor
by belonging to a secret organization of Masonic or
para-Masonic kind, but because of a radical divergence
in their geopolitical attitudes. As to the explanation
of the final “secret” of these opposing forces, we are
inclined to see it in the difference between two
alternative and mutually excluding geopolitical
projects, which stand aside of national, political,
ideological and religious differences, people of the
most contradictory opinions and beliefs uniting into one
single group. Our conspirologic pattern is the pattern
of “geopolitical conspiracy”.
The bases of
geopolitics
Let's remind the basic postulates of geopolitics - a
science which was earlier called also as “political
geography” and whose elaboration must be basically
attributed to the english scientist and political expert
Halford Mackinder (1861-1947). The term “geopolitics”
was for the first time introduced by the swedish Rudolf
Kjellen (1864-1922) and then entered into the reference
in Germany by Karl Haushofer (1869-1946). But anyway,
the father of geopolitics remains Mackinder, whose
fundamental pattern stood at the bases of all subsequent
geopolitical studies. A merit of Mackinder is that he
managed to outline and to comprehend the definite
objective laws of political, geographical and economic
history of mankind. If the term “geopolitics” appeared
rather recently, the realities designated by these terms
have a pluri-millennial history. The substance of the
geopolitical doctrine can be summarized in the following
principles. In planetary history there are
two opposite and constantly competing approaches to the
assimilation of land space - "overland" approach and
"maritime" approach. Depending on what attitude
(“overland” or “maritime”) the diverse states, peoples,
nations, their historical consciousness adhere to, their
external and domestic policy, their psychology, their
worldview are shaped according to completely definite
rules. Given such feature, it is quite possible to speak
about an “overland”, “continental” or even “steppe”
(“steppe” is “land” in its pure, ideal kind) worldview
and about a “maritime”, “insular”, “oceanic” or
“aquatic” worldview. (We shall notice incidentally, that
the first hints of a similar approach can be discovered
in the works of the Russian slavophiles - as Khomyakov
and Kiryevsky). In the ancient history the “maritime”
powers who became an historical symbol of “maritime
civilization” as a whole were Phoenicia and Carthago.
The overland empire opposing Carthago was Rome. The
Punic war is the purest image of the opposition of
“maritime civilization” and “overland civilizations”. In
the Modern Age and in recent history the insular” and
“maritime” pole became England, “Mistress of the seas”
and, later, the giant island-continent America. England,
as well as ancient Phoenicia, used as the basic
instrument of domain in the first place sea trade and
colonization of coastal areas. The poenician-anglo-saxon
geopolitical type generated a special
“mercantile-capitalist-market” pattern of civilization
founded first of all on economic and material interests
and the principles of economic liberalism. Therefore,
despite of all possible historical variations, the
general kind of “maritime” civilization is always
linked with “primacy of economics above politics”. As
against the phoenician pattern, Rome represented a
sample of warlike-authoritarian structure based on
administrative control and civil religiosity, on the
primacy of “politics above economy”. Rome is the example
of a non-maritime, but overland, purely continental type
of colonization, with its deep penetration into the
continent and assimilation of the submitted peoples,
automatically “romanized” after the conquest. In Modern
History the incarnations of the “overland” power were
the Russian Empire and also Central European imperial
Austro-Hungary and Germany. “Russia - Germany -
Austro-Hungary” are the essential symbols of
“geopolitical land” during Modern History. Mackinder
clearly showed that in the last few centuries the
“maritime attitude” means “atlantism”, as today “sea
powers” above all are England and America, that is
Anglo-Saxon countries. Against “atlantism” personifying
the primacy of individualism, “economic liberalism” and
“democracy of a Protestant kind”, stands “eurasism”,
necessarily supposing authoritarianism, hyerarchy and
the establishment of “communitarian”, national-state
principles above simply human, individualistic and
economic concerns. The clearly expressed eurasian
attitude is typical first of all of Russia and Germany,
the two mightiest continental powers, whose
geopolitical, economic and - most important – wordlview
concerns are completely opposite to those of England -
US, that is “atlantists”.
“Conspiracy of the
atlantists”
Mackinder, as an englishman and “atlantist”, observed
the danger of an eurasian consolidation and, since the
end of 19th century, urged the government of England to
do everything possible to prevent an Eurasian alliance,
and especially an alliance of Russia – Germany - Japan
(he considered Japan as a power of essentially
continental and eurasian worldview). In Mackinder one
can find the clearly formulated and minutely described
ideology of accomplished and absolutized “atlantism”,
whose doctrine stands at the base of anglo-saxon
geopolitical strategy in the 20th century. Proceeding
from this, we can define the essence of intelligence
work, military espionage, political lobbysm, oriented
towards England and USA, as the “Atlantic ideology”, the
ideology of “New Carthago”- the one that is common to
all “influential agents”, to all secret and occultist
organizations, to all lodges and semi-closed clubs which
served and serve the anglo-saxon idea in the 20th
century, penetrating the network of all continental
“eurasian”powers. And naturally, in the first place this
immediately concerns english and american reconnaissance
services (especially the CIA), which are not
simply the “sentinels of capitalism” or “americanism”,
but the sentinels of “atlantism”, united by a
deep-rooted and pluri-millennial super-ideology of the
“oceanic” kind. It is possible to call the aggregate of
all “networks” of anglo-saxon influence as the
“participants of the atlantic conspiracy”, working not
only in the interests of each separate country, but in
the interest of a special geopolitical and, in the end,
metaphysical doctrine representing an extremely
multi-planed, miscellaneous and wide, but nevertheless
essentially uniform worldview. So, generalizing the
ideas of Mackinder, it is possible to say that there is
an historical “conspiracy of the atlantists”, pursuing
through the centuries the same geopolitical purposes
oriented to the interest of the “maritime civilization”
of neo-phoenician kind. And it is important to stress
that “atlantists” can be both “left-”, and “right-wing”,
both “atheists”, and “believers”, both “patriots”, and
“cosmopolitans”, as the common geopolitical worldview
stands behind all particular national and political
differencies. Therefore we deal with the most real
“occult conspiracy”, whose meaning and metaphysical
intrinsic cause often remain completely obscure to its
immediate participants, and even to its most key
figures.
Conspiracy of the
“eurasists”
Mackinder’s ideas, revealing that definite historical
and political regularity which many before had guessed
or foreseen, opened the way to the explicit ideological
formulation of the opposition to atlantism in the pure
“eurasian doctrine”. The first principles of the
eurasian geopolitics were formulated by russian white
emigrants known under the name of “eurasists” (prince
N.Trubetskoy, Savitsky, Florovsky etc.) and the famous
german geopolitician Karl Haushofer. Moreover, the fact
of the frequent meetings of russian “eurasists” with
Karl Haushofer in Prague cause us to esteem that german
and russian geopoliticians developed the related topics
simultaneously and in a parallel way. Moreover, in the
subsequent analysis they followed just the same
principles, insisting on the necessity of the eurasian
geopolitical alliance of Russia-Germany-Japan as a
counterweight to “atlantist” policies aiming at any cost
to opposing Russia to Germany and Japan. Russian
eurasists and the Haushofer group formulated the
definite principles of a continental, eurasian worldview
alternative to atlantist ideas. It is possible to say
that for the first time they expressed what stood behind
the whole european political history of the last
millenium, having traced the path of the “Roman imperial
idea”, which from Ancient Rome through Byzantium had
passed to Russia, and through the Medieval Sacred Empire
of the German nations to Austro-Hungary and Germany.
Thus russian eurasists attentively and deeply analyzed
the imperial and to the maximum extent “overland”
mission of Gengis Khan and the Mongols, having stressed
the continental significance of the Turks. The group of
Haushofer, for his part, studied Japan and the
continental mission of the Far Eastern states in the
perspective of the future geopolitical alliance. So, in
reply to Mackinder’s frank confession, enlighting the
secret planetary “atlantist” strategy, laying its roots
deep into the centuries, russian and german eurasists in
the ‘20s discovered the logics of the alternative
continental strategy, the secret overland “imperial
idea”, heir of Rome, which invisibly inspired power
[derzhava] policies with an
authoritarian-idealistic, communitarian-heroic worldview
- from the empire of Charles the Great to the Sacred
Union proposed by the great russian czar Alexander the
First, deep eurasian mystic invisibly. The Eurasian idea
is as global as the Atlantic one, and it too had set its
“secret agents” in all historical states and nations.
All those who restlessly worked for the eurasian union,
those who hindered for centuries the propagation on the
continent of individualist, egualitarian and
liberal-democratic concepts (reproducing as a whole the
typical phoenician spirit of the “primacy of economics
above politics”), those who aspired to unite the great
eurasian peoples in the atmosphere of East, instead of
in an atmosphere of West – be it the East of Gengis
Khan, the East of Russia or East of Germany - all of
them were “Eurasian agents”, bearers of the special
geopolitical doctrine, “the soldiers of the continent”,
“the soldiers of Land”. The Eurasian secret society, the
Order of the eurasists, does not start at all with the
authors of the manifest “Exodus to the East” or with
Haushofer’s “Geopolitical Journal”. This was, briefly
speaking, only the revelation, the outcoming of a
definite knowledge which existed since the beginning of
time, together with its relative secret societies and
network of “influential agents”. No less than in the
case of Mackinder, its belonging to the aenygmatic
“secret societies” is historically established.
Order of Eurasia against Order
of Atlantic (Atlantides). Eternal Rome against Eternal
Carthago. Occult punic war invisibly continuing
during millennia. Planetary conspiracy of Land against the
Sea, Earth against Water, Authoritarianism and Idea
against Democracy and Matter.
Does not the endless paradoxes, contradictions,
omissions and vagaries of our history become more clear,
more logical and more reasonabe, if we to look at them
from the perspective of an occult geopolitical dualism?
Will not in this case the countless victims, by which
mankind in our century pays the bill for unclear
political projects, receive a deep metaphysical
justifying? Is it not a noble and grateful gesture to
recognize all those who fell on the battlefields of the
XXth century as the soldier-heroes of the Great War of
Continents, instead of compliant puppets of conventional
and constantly varying political regimes, transient and
unstable, passing and casual, meaningless to such
extent, that death for the sake of them looks trivial
and silly? Different deal, if the fallen heroes served
to Great Land or Great Ocean, if aside from political
demagogy and raging propaganda of ephemeral ideologies
they served the great geopolitical purpose before the
pluri-millennial planetary history.
“Blood and Soil” - “Blood or
Soil?”
The famous russian philosopher, religious thinker and
publicist Konstantin Leontyev pronounced this extremely
relevant formula: “Slavness [Slavyanstvo] does
exist, slavism does not”. One of the basic geopolitical
conclusions of this remarkable author was the opposition
betwen the idea of “panslavism” and “Asian”
[asyatskoy] idea. If we attentively analyze this
opposition, we shall detect a general typological
criterion, which will allow us to better understand
structure and logics of the geopolitical occult war of
the Eurasian Order against the Atlantic Order. Contrary
to to the eclectic combination of terms in the concept
of “Blood and Soil” by the german ideologist of
national-socialist peasantry Wahlter Darré, at the level
of geopolitical forces occult war in the modern world
this problem is differently formulated - namely, “blood
or soil”. In other words, traditionalist projects of
preserving of identity of the people, state or the
nations always stand before an alternative – which one
to take as the dominant criterion, whether “unity of
nation, race, ethnos, unity of blood” or “unity of
geographical space, unity of borders, unity of soil”.
Thus the whole drama consists in the necessity of the
choice: “either - or”, and each hypothetical "also"
remains only an utopian slogan which is not decisive,
but only obscuring the fineness of the problem.
Ingenious Konstantin Leontyev, convicted traditionalist
and radical russophile, adressed precisely this
question: «Russians must either insist on the unity of
the slavs, on slavism (“blood”), or turn to the East and
realize the geographical and cultural affinity Russian
to eastern to the peoples linked to Russian territories
(“soil”)». This question can be formulated in different
terms as a choice between confession of the supremance
of law of “race” (“nationalism”) or “geopolitics”
(“statehood”, “culture”). Leontyev himself chose “soil”,
“territory”, the specificity of great-russian imperial
religious and state culture. He chose
“orientalism” [vostochnost’],
“asiatism” [azyatsnost’], “byzantism”. Such
choice implied the priority of continental, eurasian
values above narrow-national and racial values.
Leontyev’s logics quite obviously resulted in the
inevitability of the Russian-German, and especially
Russo-Austrian union, and in the peace with Turkey and
Japan. Leontyev’s categorical denial of “slavism” or
“pan-slavism” roused indignation among many late
slavopohiles, standing on the position of “blood is
higher than soil”, or “blood and soil”. Leontyev was
neither understood neither listened to. The history of
the XXth century repeatedly demonstrated the
extraordinary relevance of the problems he laid.
Panslavism against eurasism
The thesis “blood is higher than soil (in Russian
context, it means “slavism”, “panslavism”) for the first
time revealed all its equivocacy during the First World
War, when Russia, having entered into alliance with the
countries of the the Entente (the English, French
and Americans), aiming to free the “slav brothers” from
Turkish domination, not only began to fight
against its natural geopolitical allies - Germany and
Austria, - but also plunged itself into the
catastrophe of revolution and civil war. As a matter of
fact, Russian “slavism” has worked on the side of
“atlantists”, of the Entente and of a type of
“neo-carthaginian civilization”, embodied in the
mercantile-colonial, individualistic Anglo-Saxon model.
It is not surprising, that among “patriot-panslavists”
from the circle of the sovereign–emperor Nikolay II, the
majority were employees of the english intelligence or
simply “atlantist influential agents”. It is curious to
recollect an episode from the novel of the russian
patriot and ataman [head of Cossack militias]
Peter Krasnov From the bicephal eagle to the red
flag, where in the fire of the First World war of
the major hero of the colonel Sablin ask: “Say frankly,
colonel, whom you count as our genuine enemy?”, and he
univocally answers: “England!”, though this conviction
does not prevent him to honestly and courageously fight
for english interests against Germany, following his
duty of absolute loyalty to the eurasian Emperor. The
hero of the Krasnov’s novel is the ideal example of
Russian patriot-eurasist, example the logics of “soil
over blood”, which was characteristic for count Witte,
for baron Ungern-Sternberg, for the mysterious
organization “Baltikum”, consisting of Baltic
aristocrats, till last minute remaining devoted to the
imperial family (just like faithful to the czar in the
chaos of universal betraying remained the turkmeni
prince with his division, described in the same novel by
Krasnov). It is striking, to what extent courageously
and nobly acted during 1917 Asians, Turks, Germans and
others “from other motherlands” [inorodtsi],
serving by belief and truth the Czar and the Empire,
serving Eurasia, “soil”, “continent” - in contrast to
with many “slavs”, “pan-slavists”, quickly forgetting
about “Constantinople” and the “Balkan brothers” and
running away from Russia, leaving Czar and Fatherland,
to the countries of “Atlantic” influence, to Western
Ocean, to Water, betraying not only the Native land, but
the great Idea of Eternal Rome, Russian Third Rome,
Moscow.
The atlantists and racism
In Germany the affirmation of the idea “blood is
higher than soil” produced not less terrible
consequences. Contrary to the russophile and eurasist
German patriots – Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Karl
Haushofer etc.- insisting on the “supremacy of law of
vital space" 1
in the interest of the continent as a whole, on the idea
of the “continental block”, in the government of the
Third Reich eventually victory went to the “atlantist”
lobby, maintaining racist theses and - under pretext of
the “anglo-aryans and related german ethnoses” - aiming
to divert Hitler's attention to the East and to suspend
(or at least to weaken) war actions against England.
“Pangermanism” in this case (as well as russian
“panslavism” in the First World War) only worked on the
side of the “atlantists”. And it is completely logical
that a major enemy of Russia, constantly aspiring to
engage Hitler’s Germany in conflict against Russia,
against the slavs (on “racial” reasons, "blood is higher
than soil”), was the english spy and betrayer of the
Reich, admiral Canaris. The problem “blood or soil” is
extremely relevant also because the choice of one of
these two terms to the detriment of the other allows to
identify - maybe indirectly and mediately - the
“influential agents” of this or that geopolitical
worldview, specially when dealing with the “right” wing
or “nationalists”. The essential feature of the
“geopolitical conspiracy” of the atlantists (as,
however, also of the eurasists) is that it covers the
whole spectrum of political ideologies from the extreme
right to the extreme left, but anyway the “geopolitical
agents of influence” always leave their particular
tracks. In the case of the “right”, such sign of
potential atlantism is the principle of “blood over
soil”, which, besides everything else, allows to
abstract from the fundamentality of geopolitical
problems, withdrawing the attention of leaders and
statesmen to less relevant issues.
Who is the spy of whom?
As an example of the effect of occult geopolitical
ideology of the “left”, it is possible to mention the
eurasist national-bolsheviks from Germany - for
instance, the German communist-nationalist Ernst
Niekisch, the conservative revolutionary Ernst Junger,
the communists Lauffenberg, Petel, Schultzen-Boysen,
Winnig etc. Eurasist national-bolsheviks undoubtedly
were also among the Russians, and the circumstance is
curious, that Lenin itself during the emigration aspired
to be pulled together to German politics and financiers;
moreover, many of his theses were rather frankly
germanophile. We do not want in this case to affirm that
Lenin was involved in the Eurasian Order, but in some
measure he was under the influence of this Order.
Anyway, the opposition “Lenin=German spy” -
“Trotsky=American spy” really corresponded to a definite
typological scheme. In any case, at the pure
geopolitical level, the operating of Lenin’s government
had an Eurasian character, if only because, contrary to
the authentic Marxist doctrine, he preserved the united
great eurasian space of the Russian Empire. (Trotsky, on
his part, insisted on exporting Revolution, on its
“mondialization”, and considered the Soviet Union as
something transient and ephemeral, as the bridgehead for
ideological expansion, something which should disappear
before the planetary victory of “messianic communism”;
as a whole, Trotsky’s mission bore on itself the mark of
“atlantism”, as opposed to communist “eurasist” Lenin).
Leninist-bolshevik “internationalism” itself had a
definite “imperial”, “eurasian” measurement-principle of
“soil above blood” - though, certainly, this principle
was distorted and misinterpreted due to the influence of
other aspects of the bolshevik ideology and, most
important, due to the activities of “influential agents”
of atlantism inside the same communist government.
Summing up all these reasons, it is possible to say that
a distinctive feature of the representatives of the
Eurasian Order in Russia was almost “compulsory”
germanophily (or, at least, “anglophoby”), and
conversely, in Germany eurasists were “compelled” to be
russophile. Moeller van der Bruck made once a very
correct remark: “French conservatives were always
excited by the example of Germany, German conservatives
by the example of Russia”. Here the whole logics is
revealed of the geopolitical, continental backgound of
the invisible occult fight passing through the centuries
- the occult War of Continents.
You said GRU, mister
Parvulesco?
Alone among western conspirolgists, to constantly stress
the geopolitical character of the “world conspiracy” or,
more exactly, two alternative “of world conspiracies”
(“Euroasian” and “Atlantic”), is the ingenious French
writer, poet and metaphysician Jean Parvulesco, author
of many literary and philosophical works. In its long
and extremely eventful life he was personally familiar
with many prominent figures of the European and world
history, including with the representatives of an
“occult, parallel history” - mystics, outstanding
masons, kabbalists, esoterists, secret agents of various
special services, ideologists, politicians and artists.
(In particular, he was friend of Ezra Pound, Julius
Evola, Arno Brekker, Otto Skorzely, Pierre de
Villemarest, Raymond Abellio etc .) Having heard about
the specificity of our conspirologic studies, Parvulesco
has granted us some documents labeled as
strictly-confidential, which have allowed us to discover
many major details of the planetary geopolitical
conspiracy. A special interest is exhibited by materials
concerning the activity of secret occult organizations
in Russia. In the further description we shall try to
expose the most interesting aspects of Parvulesco’s
conception. On February 24, 1989 in Lausanne, before the
members of the administrative council of the mysterious
“Institute for Special Metastrategical Studies
‘Atlantis'” Jean Parvulesco presented a report under the
intriguing title The GRU Galaxy, with the
subheading The confidential mission of Mikhail
Gorbachev, the USSR and the future of the great Eurasian
Continent. In this report - a copy of which
Parvulesco transmitted to us - he analyzed the occult
role of the Soviet military intelligence service
otherwise called GRU (Glavnoe Razvedyvatelnoe
Upravlenie, Major Intelligence Service), and the
connection of the GRU with the secret Order of Eurasia.
As a reference, Parvulesco chose the book of the well
known specialist in the field of Soviet special service,
the famous agent of the French
counter-intelligence and director of the “European Data
Centre” Pierre de Villemarest, who in 1988 released in
France the best seller “GRU, the most secret among
the Soviet special services, 1918-1988”.
GRU against KGB
The conspirological model of the same Villemarest can be
summarized as follows: “KGB is a continuation of the
party, GRU is a continuation of the army. Already by its
definition, the army defends the state, KGB defends the
party... KGB is guided by the principle “patriotism at
the service of communism”, while the army by the
opposite principle “communism at the service of
patriotism”. Proceeding from this logics of opposition
between GRU and KGB as the most secret centres of
bipolar power in the USSR (the army and the party),
Villemarest builds the fascinating and argumented
narration of the history of GRU. The secret sense of the
invisible history of the USSR from the October
revolution to the Perestroyka is to be found in the
rivalry of “neighbours” - GRU, the “Aquarium” or
the “military section 44388” at Khodynka, and
KGB, the “office” at Lubyanka. But what is the
connection between these rival special services and the
two planetary geopolitical Orders, even more secret and
hidden than most secret intelligence services? According
to Parvulesco, the Eurasian Order was especially active
in Russia in the beginning of the 20th century. Among
its representatives he counts the St.Petersburg doctor
Badmaev, baron von Ungern-Sternberg, the Swedish secret
curators of Rasputin (signing their cyphrogramms by the
pseudonym “Green”) and many other less known characters.
It is necessary also to outline the special role of the
future marshall Mikhail Tukhachevsky, who, according to
Parvulesco, was initiated to the mysterious Polar Order
during his stay in the German detention camp of
Ingolstadt - where strikingly, just in the same period
1916-1918, we meet other major figures of modern
history: general de Gaulle, general von Ludendorff and
the future Pope Pio XII, monsignor Eugenio Pacelli. Just
from this group of Russian geopolitical mystics, the
testimony of the relay-race was later transmitted to the
bolshevik regime, but basically to esoterists of
continental attitude grouped in the army, in army
structures, where there was a significant number of
former imperial officers who had entered the ranks of
the reds in order to change in the long run the
bolsheviks’ nihilistic attitude of and to create the
Great Continental Power using the communists,
pragmatically possessed by the messianic idea. What
matters is that among the red there were some agents of
the Eurasian Order executing the secret continental
mission. (It is curious, that the famous red robber
Kotovskiy was a left-anarchist, occultist and mystic,
and some specific parts of his biography justify the
belief that in his case there have been contacts with
the Eurasian Order). Thus, between pre-revolutionary and
post-revolutionary Russian “eurasists” there existed a
continuity of members. The creation of the Red Army was
bisiness of the agents of Eurasia; and in this respect
it is curious to remind an historical event, that twenty
seven days after the creation of the general headquarter
of the Red Army on the Eastern Front (July 10, 1918) a
crew of Chekists attacked it and liquidated all of its
members, including the commander-in-chief. The cruel war
between “red eurasists” from the Army and the “ red
atlantists” from Djerdjinsky's Cheka did not stop for
one minute since the first days of the Soviet history.
But despite the victims, the agents of the Eurasian
Order among the reds did not leave their mission. A
triumph of the eurasists was in 1918 the creation within
the Red Army of the GRU (Major Intelligence Service)
under the direction of Semyon Ivanovich Aralov, former
imperial officer and until 1917 linked to the military
intelligence. More precisely, Aralov was the head of the
Operational Department of Vseroglavshtab
[All-Russian Major Staff], where the reconnaissance
service entered as one of its constituting parts. The
peculiarity of his activity, that mysterious, almost
mystical immunity, which this man enjoyed through all
his life during the most careful “purges” (he died by
natural death on May 22, 1969), and also some other
details of his biography cause to see in Aralov the man
of the Continental Order.
White eurasists - red
eurasists
According to Parvulesco, the russian affiliate of the
eurasist Order after the Revolution was established in
the Red Army, and even more exactly, in its most secret
department - the GRU. But this concerned, naturally,
only “red” eurasists. “White” eurasists in Europe
generally joined the german nationalists, and we find
representatives of this Order in the Abwehr
[Counter-intelligence], and later in foreign sections of
the SS and SD [Sicherheit Dienst] (specially SD,
whose chief Heydrik was himself a convinced eurasist,
for which reason he too fell victim of the intrigues of
the atlantist Canaris). The revolution divided the
Russians between “reds” and “whites”, but behind this
political and conditioned division there was a different
mysterious geopolitical partition into areas of
influence of the two secret orders - Atlantic and
Eurasian. In red Russia the atlantists were grouped
around the Cheka and around the Politburo, although
never before the appointment of Kruschev any open
“atlantist” held the seat of General Secretary (Lenin
and Stalin were “eurasists” or, at least, subject to
strong influence form the agents of the Eurasian Order).
Among the white russian emigration the atlantists were
not less than in Russia itself, and apart from obvious
english spies - liberals such as Kerensky and other
democrats and Social Democrats - even in the field of
extreme rightists, monarchists, the atlantist lobby was
extremely strong - to it belonged even such a “right”
philosopher as Berdyaev, and many others. (The
overwhelming majority of russian emigrants which
appeared in the US were related to this geopolitical
attitude.) In a definite moment, at the beginning of the
‘30s, the network of GRU agents in Europe and especially
in Germany penetrates deeply into the structures of
german and french intelligence, and the GRU network
duplicates the network of NKVD and later KGB agents. GRU
agents first of all penetrated into army structures and
sometimes the common eurasian platform makes the people
from GRU and other european secret agents not so much
enemies, how much allies, collaborators, secretly (even
to their own governments) preparing a new continental
project. Here again we are not talking about double
agents, as about the unity of the highest geopolitical
interests. So in Germany the GRU holds contact with some
Walter Nikolay, head of the “Bureau for the jewish
question” . Thanks to him the GRU gains access to the
highest direction of the Abwehr, SS and SD. The
central figure of this network was Martin Bormann
himself. (This fact was well known to the allies after
fact-findings linked to the Nuremberg process, and many
of them were sure that Bormann after 1945 was hidden
just in the USSR. It is known for certain that Walter
Nikolay himself really passed in May 1945 to the
Russians).
The Ribbentropp-Molotov pact and the
subsequent revenge of the atlantists
In relation to Martin Bormann, friend of Ribbentropp and
Walter Nikolay, Jan Parvulesco himself tells
one extremely revealing story, casting some light on the
secrets of the occult war between the two geopolitical
Orders. Arno Brekker, the famous German sculptor, who
very well knew Bormann, told Parvulesco about one
strange visit from him in Jackelsburg. «On June 22,
1941, immediately after the attack of Hitler’s Germany
against the USSR, Bormann came to him without a warning,
in a state of shock, having left his office at the
Reichskanzlerei. He was constantly repeating the same
mysterious sentence: “Non-being, in this June day, has
gained victory above Being... All is over... All is
lost..” When the sculptor asked what he meant, Bormann
kept silent; then, already at the door, he turned as he
wanted to add something, then decided not to, and left
slamming the door». That was the great collapse of
long-term efforts for the eurasian agents. For the
atlantists, the date of June 22, 1941 was a great
celebration day: the intra-continental war of the two
major eurasian powers, one against the other, was a
pledge of triumph for the Atlantic Order, irrespective
of what side victory would go to. June 22, 1941 for the
Order of the eurasists was an even more tragic event
than the October revolution. It is important to stress
that the agents of the Eurasian Order used their best
efforts to avert the conflict. Preparatives for the
conclusion to the maximum extent of the symbolical pact
“Ribbentropp-Molotov” (both, by the way, were
out-and-out eurasists) were actively led from both sides
during long years. In 1936 Stalin, definitively shifting
at the threshold of the ‘30s on the side of the Order of
Eurasia, had given Berzin, chief of the GRU (Berzin was
the exception of a rule: agent of atlantism heading the
eurasian organization and working inside it for the
NKVD) this order: « Immediately suspend any activity
against Germany ». (It must be noticed that Berzin
ignored this order). In 1937 Heydrik and Himmler in a
secret dispatch assured the Fuehrer, that «Germany is
not more a target of Komintern activity, and also of
other Soviet subversive activities». The pact
Ribbentropp-Molotov was the summit of strategic success
for the eurasists. But at the last moment the Oceanic
forces overcame. The eurasists in GRU and, more
generally, in the army - Voroshilov, Timoshenko, Zhukov,
Golikov etc.- until the last moment refused to believe
in the possibility of war, since the serious influence
of the eurasian (that is, russophile) lobby in the Third
Reich was perfectly known to them. (National-socialist
anti-slavic propaganda they deemed so insignificant and
superficial, as well as Marxist demagogic
internationalist rethorics in the USSR). General Golikov
(concealing his noble origins and his authentic date of
birth, and also his true biography, on motives purely
linked to conspiracy within the “Eurasian” order) even
reproached his subordinates, having received the piece
of information about the Germans crossing the Soviet
border: “English provocation! Investigate! ” He did not
know at that moment what Martin Boormann already knew:
“Non-being has gained victory over Being”.
Contours of the Atlantic
lobby
The secret Atlantic Order has a most ancient history.
Some traditonalist authors trace it back to the
initiatic societies of ancient Egypt and specially to a
sect worshipping the god Seth, whose symbols were the
Crocodile and Behemoth (i.e. aquatic animals), and also
the Red Ass (see J.Robin Secret societies in
apocalyptical rendez-vous, J.M.Allemand René
Guénon and Seven towers of the devil etc.). Later
the sect of Seth merged with various phoenician cults,
specially with the bloody cult of Moloch. According to
the French conspirologist of the XIXth century Claude
Grasset d'Orcet, this secret organization still existed
many centuries after after the ruin of the phoenician
civilization. In Middle Age Europe it existed under the
name of “Minstrels of Morgana”, whose emblem was the
“Dancing Death”, or Dance Macabre. Grasset d'Orcet
affirmed that Luther's Reformation was conducted under
the instruction of this sect and that Protestants
(especially Anglo-Saxon and French) still remain under
its influence. Jan Parvulesco believes that Giuseppe
Balsamo, the famous Cagliostro, was one of the major
agents of this secret Order which emerged at the surface
at the end of the XVIII century under the mask of the
irregular “Egyptian” Masonry of Memphis rite, later of
Memphis-Mithra. Such symbolical prehistory of the
atlantists characterizes the substance of their
geopolitical and cultural-economic strategy. Its sense
is reduced to emphasizing “horizontal” values, to bring
on the foreground the lowest aspects of the human being
and society as a whole. This does not mean that
atlantism is identical to vulgar materialism, but
anyway, the “material”, purely economic, commercial
aspect of human activity holds the central place in it.
The notion of a system of values at a merely human level
supposes individualism and radical anthropocentrism,
peculiar to atlantism in all its manifestations, and in
parallel to this notion there necessarily emerges the
typical “Atlantic” scepticism and depressive irony in
relation to ideal, supra-human measure of life. In fact,
the images of the Red Ass and the Dancing Death
perfectly mirror the substance of “Atlantic” scepticism.
And according to the strange logics of history, the most
radical forms of protestantism, individualistm, social
and religious critical consciousness after Lutherian
reform, as a matter of fact, were “attracted” as a
magnet towards the Atlantic regions - to England and
further Westward, even deeper into the Atlantic - to
America, where found a favourable ground the most
extreme forms of radical protestantism incarnated by
Baptists, Quakers and Mormons. (J.M. Allemand marked a
symbolical concurrence: from Cadiz - a port which was
historically the major centre of phoenician colonies on
the Iberian peninsula - Cristopher Columbus sailed for
his Atlantic expedition, concluded with the discovery of
America). But the consolidation of the Atlantic Order in
the Extreme West and the creation of an exclusively
Atlantic civilization in the US, acoording to the
project of this Order, were just an intermediate stage
in the “neo-carthagenian”plans of the atlantists. The
following strategic step consisted in exporting the
Atlantic model on the other continents, in the
geopolitical colonization of the whole planet, in the
transfer of the West, in mystical and geopolitical
sense, all over the world, including, of course, also
the East. Therefore the network of Atlantic agents in
the states of Eurasia not only pursued a defensive goal
(weakening the alternative geopolitical force), but also
supposed offensive operations. The avantgarde of
“atlantism” in Eurasia were “leftists”, “anarchist”
subversive movements, though also in their environment
there always existed an internal eurasian opposition.
However, is is necessary to recognize “economic
socialism” and “communism” in their theoretical and pure
kind as the “atlantic” form of propaganda, the
socio-political mask for the secret Order of the Red
Ass. If we take into account the specifical geopolitical
and occult doctrines of the Atlantic pole, it becomes
completely clear why “leftist” subversive movements were
so much encouraged by the Anglo-Saxon powers in
continental European and Eurasian countries, while in
England, and especially in America, “communists” and
“social-democrats” constitute an insignificant
percentage. For the atlantist lobby, “leftists” have
always been the fifth column in Eurasia. From here also
comes that natural harmony between russian atlantists of
communist inclination and anglo-saxon capitalists, which
so often leads to a blind alley foreign scholars and
historians, wondering about such complete mutual
understanding between “class enemies” – between
“messianic” bolsheviks with their dictatorship of
proletariat and Wall Street bankers with their cult of
the Golden Veal. The secret society of the Dancing
Death, Red Ass, “Minstrels of Morgana”, Brotherhood of
the Ocean - these images will help us to understand the
logics of the world atlantist lobby, aspiring not only
to defend their “islands”, but also to turn the whole
planet into “Carthago”, in the united universal “ human
market”.
continue...
|