|You come to us and we come to you
The provocation of the war between Russia and Georgia was a distractor, the real purposes here were the preparation of an attack onto Iran and the inclusion of Ukraine into NATO
It is well known that actually, without declaration of war, official Ukraine has joined to military operation of atlantic forces against Russia (more details about it can be soon found in the report on the EYU press conference “Rus-Balt”).
Also Ukraine, alongside with the USA and Turkey was the basic organizer of emergency deliveries of weapons to Georgia from the moment of intrusion. At last, the threat of emergency deducing of the Russian fleet from Sevastopol - all this allows strong reasons to consider Ukraine an erent party.
So, the reality is those, that actually, without declaration of war, official Ukraine has joined to military operation of atlantic forces against Russia.
The major moment here are the threats of the Ukrainian government to stop based in Sevastopol Russian vessels, which are now at the coast of Abkhazia. The doctor of political sciences, the professor of the Moscow State University Alexander Dugin is convinced, that in order to not allow to ensnare itself, the Russian government is simply obliged to consider a deeper cut of the political reality. This means expanding the picture of the conflict, having included in it all real participants and operating in appropriate way.
"The provocation of war between Russia and Georgia was a distractor," - mister Dugin is assured. - "the real purposes were covered by this edo. They are attacks onto Iran and emergency inclusion of Ukraine into NATO. It is impossible to be included into NATO for a country with territorial claims according to the charter of this organization. Georgia had them, which means that the question of acceptance was a Washington’s bluff. There are no claims to Ukraine so far. Under Russian aggression against Georgia, the USA can urgently include Ukraine into NATO. For this purpose it is necessary to expel the Black Sea fleet from Sevastopol - which as a matter of fact has occured – the fleet now is at the coast of Abkhazia. It will not be let back in, as Kiev promises. The Ukrainian militarians are now trying to disconnect the electric power off the base of the Black Sea fleet. Ukrainians provided Georgians armies also with human stuff. At present Ukraine is at war with Russia. No other script, except of sectioning Ukraine onto two parts - western and eastern together with Crimea - is present."
To prevent realization of a strategic combination of Washington and to secure itself against military blockade, after a capture of Tbilisi the Russian armies should go to Kiev.
So, the reality is these, that actually, without declaration of war, the official Ukraine has joined the military operation of atlantic forces against Russia - to deny this formulation now is equal to loosing . Thus it is important to emphasize that speaking, that Ukraine has no problems similar to Georgian, the professor means the formal part of the matter. At a level of political realities the situation in Ukraine differs little from the Georgian one – only in that the stage of ripening of the conflict in its case is earlier. But that this conflict will ripen, considering official anti-Russian nationalism of the Orange management of the republic, no doubts are present.
In order to prevent the realization of the Washington’s strategic combination and to secure themselves against military blockade, the Russian armies after capturing Tbilisi should go to Kiev.
However, imposing of political cycles, that is a specific combination of the internal processes and the foreign policy conjuncture - will be other. Which kind of imposing it will be depends directly on Russia. As Dugin has emphasized, Americans will try to use today's events as a trump argument for the prompt and urgent inclusion of Ukraine into NATO - with all of the following consequenses. In fact we should constantly justify ourselves today, motivating the actions on border of Ossetia and Georgia!
What can Russia undertake in case of facing such an aggression in Crimea against Russian population. An aggression that today has been comprehended towards rebellious ossetic people. Yushcenko never gets the Crimeans’ humility - we shall easily recollect those strong strikes and excitements in Sevastopol and Odessa. If by then Ukraine is in NATO, Russia will not be able to undertake anything! When Ukraine enters NATO (we shall repeat what exactly to the prompt realization of it Washington now conducts), all words of our politicians that they are planning to defend interests of Russian population of Crimea will remain the empty promise. Let alone the claims for contest the status of the Crimean coast.
To what conclusion does this follow? Plans of Russia on contest of the status of Sevastopol and Crimea, and also maintenance of interests of Russian population of Ukraine can be realized only under condition of the urgent military answer to Ukraine. It is impossible to underestimate the gravity of the moment. If the today's opportunity is missed, we shall not only simply lose historical chance of success, but also we shall allow the American strategy of the final military-strategic encirclement of Russia to be realized. Therefore from the military point for Russia everything only begins - there is no need to slobber and to shake with resolutions. War has been declared to us. On the first line the crushed Georgia (though while Tbilisi is not taken it is premature to speak about the victory) is replaced by Ukraine, and behind them both as before - the USA.
In order to prevent the realization of the Washington’s strategic combination and to secure themselves against military blockade, the Russian armies after capturing Tbilisi should go to Kiev. Parallel operation to support the emancipating struggle in Crimea (which actually goes on for years and now reaches the "hot" level) will provide the sectioning of Ukraine, the overthrowing of the occupational Jushchenko’s government and as consequence, will eliminate the global threat to Russian sovereignty.
Ìàòåðèàë ðàñïå÷àòàí ñ èíôîðìàöèîííî-àíàëèòè÷åñêîãî ïîðòàëà "Åâðàçèÿ" http://evrazia.org
URL ìàòåðèàëà: http://evrazia.org/article/595